WRONG DECISIONS - THE DETAILS
Why record wrong decisions?
The reason for listing "wrong" decisions is a growing frustration with how these decisions can effect the result of the game. As an Englishman I have followed England closely and in the winter, Andrew Strauss was given out incorrectly 3 times in a row during the tour of Australia - ultimately this resulted in a loss of form through lack of time in the middle and resulted in him not starting the World Cup in England's starting ODI XI. Likewise, in the 2nd ODI v Australia in the Commonwealth Bank Series, Mike Hussey was caught behind off James Anderson and didn't walk at a critical time in the match. Buchanan then made his infamous comment about how England and New Zealand weren't testing Australia enough so he was worried about their preparation for pressure situations in the World Cup. We will never know if England would have won that game if Hussey had been given out or walked. It's certainly not all one way though as England enjoyed some fortuitous decisions during the 2005 Ashes which helped them clinch a tight series.
What makes a decision wrong?
The basis of calling something a "wrong" decision is simple - if technology proves that the decision was wrong, then it is listed below. The only thing to add to that statement is that the benefit of the doubt is given to the umpire on LBWs - eg. if the ball is just clipping the bail on the top of off stump and the umpire has given it not out LBW, that is considered a correct decision. If however, the ball is hitting the inside of the off stump, three quarters of the way up, and it's given not out LBW, it's considered a "wrong" decision.